ARPANSA admits Oversight – No one is covered for RF
On November 2019, we see a well-crafted admission in Orwellian
ARPANSA-speak of an “oversight” that one could read to mean:
- Woops, the Australian radiation standard does not apply to most States.
- Woops, the Australian radiation standard does not address the dosage or exposure.
- Woops, there is no protection for Australian workers (e.g. Teachers).
- Woops, if the teachers are not protected, how can their clients (children) be?
oversight – a mistake made because of a failure to notice something
If the ARPANSA standard is ineffective due to an “oversight” how can ARPANSA and industry tell the Parliamentary Inquiry 5G is safe and not be misleading Parliament?
Line 4
‘…In this case, the greater perception of risk is due to the possibility of overexposure.’
Without defining what exactly overexposure is.
THANK YOU to everyone in the ECSFR network for your perseverance, input and ongoing efforts
ECSFR requires meaningful and substantiated answers from ARPANSA within 14 days
ECSFR requires meaningful and substantiated answers from ARPANSA within 14 days Home [...]
PAPER : 5G Wireless Deployment and Health Risks
5G Wireless Deployment and Health Risks Time for a Medical Discussion in Australia and [...]
Rebutting ABC 4-Corners_The Truth About 5G
Rebutting ABC 4-Corners : The Truth About 5G This document [...]
#2 BayFm Interviews ECSFR 7 August 2020
#2 BayFm Interview - 7 Aug 2020Nyck Jeanes talks with Steve Toneguzzo- Chairman ECSFR [...]
